|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Mike Azariah
The Scope
Gallente Federation
2914
   |
Posted - 2015.08.06 17:32:37 -
[1] - Quote
Folks, I am one of the people helping to collect the questions. So you know? I IGNORE people who cannot follow basic instructions. I am collecting questions. If you write some commands of what you want done I will pass over you and go on to the next person. This is NOT your oppostunity to give orders it is an q and a session.
Now I know you lot are intelligent enough to write specific ideas in the form of questions and I welcome that. Flat out CCP do Dis. Just won't make the cut.
. . .
any questions?
m
Mike Azariah Gö¼GöÇGöÇGö¼n++ ¯|(pâä)/¯
|
Mike Azariah
The Scope
Gallente Federation
2915
|
Posted - 2015.08.06 19:39:17 -
[2] - Quote
Dirk MacGirk wrote:Mike Azariah wrote:Folks, I am one of the people helping to collect the questions. So you know? I IGNORE people who cannot follow basic instructions. I am collecting questions. If you write some commands of what you want done I will pass over you and go on to the next person. This is NOT your oppostunity to give orders it is an q and a session.
Now I know you lot are intelligent enough to write specific ideas in the form of questions and I welcome that. Flat out CCP do Dis. Just won't make the cut.
. . .
any questions?
m Yeah, why are the players asking the questions? Don't you all want to know what the players think hence you're the ones with questions? Here's a question: What are the changes coming to capitals and supercapitals so I can better frame my questions regarding how far and what fatigue should be incurred when they are jumped.?
This is a townhall type thing, Dirk. Like a podcast it is better to have a dialogue consisting of a chance to ask questions rather than giving folks a rant stage. That is why the questions are being collected and sorted and pre-sifted. Getting a Dev to take time to answer some of the questions coming up is a big thing (imho) and I do not want to a) waste it or (b) turn it into a sidetracked discussion. Thus the moderation.
I actually DO like to know what the players think and they are welcome to send me opinions/requests anytime. But this is different.
And tell me that you cannot think of questions whose very content do not let the person being asked know exactly what you think.
m
Mike Azariah Gö¼GöÇGöÇGö¼n++ ¯|(pâä)/¯
|
Mike Azariah
The Scope
Gallente Federation
2917
|
Posted - 2015.08.08 20:21:08 -
[3] - Quote
Malcanis wrote:
I forgot you were gathering questions. I have one:
What are CCP & The CSM's thoughts on refining the Phoebe travel restrictions with a view to changing the restrictive mechanism from a flat timer to a gameplay or chance-based mechanism?
.
As always, I speak for myself, not the CSM as a whole. I think the jump changes did what they set out to do. Do I think all the numbers are perfect? No, there is always room for refinement and dial turning to tweak it here and there.
A complete shift in the mechanics is also worth looking at but not one that results in 'nerf everyone except 'us'' Sadly some of the questions are leading to that. I am not sure what you mean by a gameplay mechanic. Chance? Ooooh, so much room in that word. Do you mean a chance of the person missing the destination, even by systems or a constellation (fatigue replaced by 'accuracy' which diminishes unless you allow systems and pilot to re-align) or do you mean a chance of huge fatigue or none at all?
AS Sugar said above, we are collecting and collating the questions this weekend. If you have some the end is near.
m
Mike Azariah Gö¼GöÇGöÇGö¼n++ ¯|(pâä)/¯
|
Mike Azariah
The Scope
Gallente Federation
2926
|
Posted - 2015.08.09 17:24:54 -
[4] - Quote
OK, 8 pages and some good questions and fuel for the roundtable.
I am drawing a line here and things after this may or may not be attended to. Watch for the soundcloud (the link will be posted in this thread) and perhaps even a twitch stream (not my call)
Now we sort the questions into general categories and try to find the appropriate alcohol to get the dev to talk
Thanks again, guys. You kept this civil and fairly easy to work through
m
Mike Azariah Gö¼GöÇGöÇGö¼n++ ¯|(pâä)/¯
|
Mike Azariah
The Scope
Gallente Federation
2930
|
Posted - 2015.08.12 20:53:48 -
[5] - Quote
https://soundcloud.com/mike-azariah/jump
done and yes I know that the voice over is distracting, I honestly do not hear it anymore unless it is pointed out. It was just background noise for me.
I will do better next time (if there is a next time)
m
Mike Azariah Gö¼GöÇGöÇGö¼n++ ¯|(pâä)/¯
|
Mike Azariah
The Scope
Gallente Federation
2930
|
Posted - 2015.08.13 03:52:22 -
[6] - Quote
knobber Jobbler wrote:I didn't want to be automatically negative about this but, it wasn't really a round table, more question and then defensive answering by CCP, without using any specifics. Unless they're willing to concede points and actually discuss the topics rather than brush off questions with some very canned responses i.e. "we might take a look in the future" or just being plain defensive, then there is little point to ideas like this regardless of the best intentions of the people who set it up.
Out of curiousity, How would it have been better set up, then?
Please remember that CCP does not plan on announcing new things at informal q and a sessions. But would you decide to select a small crew of players excluding the larger population as not being worthy of having the floor? Exclude anybody who has not FC'd?. Who?
Or maybe it would have been better if we moderated more sternly . . . wander off topic, *shachchack BOOM* on to the next person.
m
Mike Azariah Gö¼GöÇGöÇGö¼n++ ¯|(pâä)/¯
|
|
|
| |
|